Filed 12/20/18 In re A.D. CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
| In re A.D., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
| 2d Juv. No. B290748 (Super. Ct. No. PJ51878) (Los Angeles County) |
|
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
A.D.,
Defendant and Appellant.
|
|
In March 2016, the juvenile court declared A.D. a ward of the court after it found true allegations that he committed assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4)) and vandalism (Pen. Code, § 594, subd. (a)). The court ordered A.D. placed at home on probation for one year four months.
In June 2017, the court found true an allegation that A.D. violated probation when he tested positive for the use of marijuana. The court’s March 2016 probation order remained in effect.
In May 2018, the court found true an allegation that A.D. violated probation when he threatened to use physical force against a fellow student, tested positive for the use of marijuana, disobeyed school officials, and participated in gang activities. The court terminated probation and ordered A.D. placed at a community camp for five to seven months.
We appointed counsel to represent A.D. in this appeal. After counsel examined the record, she filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues. On October 12, 2018, we advised A.D. by mail that he had 30 days within which to submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have not received a response.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that A.D.’s attorney fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (In re Kevin S. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 97, 118-119; see People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
TANGEMAN, J.
We concur:
YEGAN, Acting P. J.
PERREN, J.
Fred J. Fujioka, Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
______________________________
Esther R. Sorkin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
