Filed 12/20/18 P. v. Brady CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
BILL BRADY,
Defendant and Appellant.
| 2d Crim. No. B291916 (Super. Ct. No. 18PT-00102) (San Luis Obispo County) |
Bill Brady appeals from the order, entered after a jury trial, granting the People’s petition under Penal Code section 2970,[1] and requiring appellant to undergo continued involuntary treatment as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) at the State Department of Mental Health for a period of one year. We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After his examination of the record, counsel filed a brief in which no issues were raised. On November 28, 2018, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. (People v. Taylor (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 304.)
On December 10, 2018, we received a supplemental letter brief from appellant which raises no arguable issues. Appellant asserts that evidence was available but never used at his trial and that “this case has already been tried and the case was overturned.” Both assertions are unsupported by the record and factually incorrect. The testimony of forensic psychologist Joe Debruin and appellant’s treatment records, constitute substantial evidence that he continues to meet the statutory criteria for commitment as an MDO. (§ 2962.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN, Acting P. J.
We concur:
PERREN, J.
TANGEMAN, J.
Michael L. Duffy, Judge
Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo
______________________________
Gerald J. Miller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Respondent.
[1] All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.