CONNERLY v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER Part II 01:30:2007
CONNERLY v
CONNERLY v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER
Filed 1/10/07
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
WARD CONNERLY,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, as Governor, etc., et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
C050204
(Super. Ct. No. 03AS05154)
STORY CONTINUED FROM PART I…….
The goal of Code of Civil Procedure section 526a taxpayer standing is the necessity of prompt action to â€
Description
Where statute was declared unconstitutional by appellate court in another case while suit challenging it was pending, and there was no evidence that state defendants intended to enforce it in violation of the appellate ruling, pending action no longer presented a justiciable case or controversy, nor was there any basis for injunctive relief.
