P. v. Smith
Filed
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
‑ ‑ ‑ ‑
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GARY DOLPH SMITH, Defendant and Appellant. | C050980 (Super. Ct. No. 05F02308) |
A jury found defendant Gary Dolph Smith guilty of battery on a former cohabitant that resulted in a traumatic condition (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)),[1] and felony battery (§ 243, subd. (d)). He was sentenced to 18 years in state prison and ordered to pay a restitution fine.
Defendant appeals, contending (1) the trial court erred in excluding evidence of the victim's prior misdemeanor prostitution convictions; (2) the court erred in admitting an act of prior domestic violence against the same victim; and (3) defense counsel failed to provide effective representation during sentencing. We shall affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
A. Facts Surrounding Present Offense
Defendant and the victim Elizabeth G. began dating in August of 2003. Elizabeth terminated the relationship in December of 2004 following an argument on December 11 that turned physical and culminated in defendant's biting her several times on the face (hereafter the December 11 incident). After the December 11 incident, defendant called Elizabeth several times in an attempt to renew their relationship.
Three months later, on