legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Jetson

P. v. Jetson
02:15:2007

P


P. v. Jetson


Filed 1/18/07  P. v. Jetson CA2/2


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION TWO







THE PEOPLE,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


            v.


TIMOTHY JETSON,


            Defendant and Appellant.



      B192623


      (Los Angeles County


      Super. Ct. No. KA074723)


THE COURT:*


            Timothy Jetson (defendant) appeals from the order after judgment denying his motion to set aside his April 17, 2006, negotiated plea of no contest to possessing base cocaine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5), with his admission that he had a prior conviction qualifying him for sentencing pursuant to the â€





Description Defendant appeals from the order after judgment denying his motion to set aside his April 17, 2006, negotiated plea of no contest to possessing base cocaine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, S 11351.5), with his admission that he had a prior conviction qualifying him for sentencing pursuant to the "Three Strikes" law (Pen. Code, Ss 667, subds. (b)-(i); 1170.12).
Court are satisfied that defendant's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale