Fear Not Law Articles: P. v. Washington

P. v. Washington

Filed 2/13/07 P. v. Washington CA1/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

DAVID DWAYNE WASHINGTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

A110614

(Alameda County

Super. Ct. No. C148468)

David Dwayne Washington was convicted, following a jury trial, of being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he contends (1) the trial court improperly excluded evidence that the man who was with appellant when he was arrested owned and possessed the gun in question; (2) the trial court improperly admitted â€

Description	Defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he contends (1) the trial court improperly excluded evidence that the man who was with appellant when he was arrested owned and possessed the gun in question; (2) the trial court improperly admitted "profile" evidence regarding drug dealing; (3) the cumulative effect of the court's errors requires reversal; and (4) the trial court incorrectly calculated appellant's presentence custody credit. Court order the custody calculation corrected to reflect an additional day of credit. Court otherwise affirmthe judgment.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.