California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
In re AARON C., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
CHERIE C.,
Defendant and Appellant.
A114278
(San FranciscoCounty
Super. Ct. No. JD053114)
Cherie C., the mother of two-year-old Aaron C., has appealed from orders of the juvenile court overruling her demurrer to an amended Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 342 subsequent petition filed by the San Francisco Department of Human Services (Department) and sustaining the jurisdictional findings on that section 342 petition, and from the jurisdiction and disposition findings and orders made at the six-month family maintenance review held pursuant to section 364. On January 25, 2007, the Department moved this court to dismiss this appeal because the juvenile court on November 15, 2006 terminated its dependency jurisdiction over Aaron C.[2] No appeal was filed from the order dismissing the dependency. Relying upon In re Michelle M. (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 326, the Department argues the appeal is moot because the dependency action was terminated and this court could not give effective relief, were appellant to prevail on her appeal.
Nevertheless, appellant opposes the motion to dismiss on the grounds that â€
Description
The mother of two-year-old child has appealed from orders of the juvenile court overruling her demurrer to an amended Welfare and Institutions Code section 342 subsequent petition filed by the San Francisco Department of Human Services (Department) and sustaining the jurisdictional findings on that section 342 petition, and from the jurisdiction and disposition findings and orders made at the six-month family maintenance review held pursuant to section 364. On January 25, 2007, the Department moved this court to dismiss this appeal because the juvenile court on November 15, 2006 terminated its dependency jurisdiction over Aaron C. No appeal was filed from the order dismissing the dependency. Relying upon In re Michelle M. (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 326, the Department argues the appeal is moot because the dependency action was terminated and this court could not give effective relief, were appellant to prevail on her appeal.
