D.L. v. Sup. Ct.
Filed 2/15/07 D.L. v. Sup. Ct. CA5
NOT TO BEPUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court,rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinionsnot certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or orderedpublished for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OFAPPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATEDISTRICT
| D. L., a Minor, etc., et al.
Petitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS COUNTY,
Respondent;
STANISLAUS CO. COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY,
Real Party in Interest.
|
F051650
(Super. Ct. No. JUV 509448)
O P I N I O N |
THECOURT*
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ review. Nancy Williamsen, Commissioner.
Hana Balfour, Parent Advocates ofStanislaus, for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Michael H. Krausnick, County Counsel and Linda S. Macy, Deputy CountyCounsel, for Real Party in Interest.
-ooOoo-
____________________
*Before Harris, A.P.J., Cornell, J., and Kane, J.
Petitioner, a minor and Mexican national, seeksextraordinary writ review (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.450-8.452 [formerly rule38-38.1]) through her guardian ad litem, of respondent court's orders denyingher reunification servicesand setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] hearingas to her infant daughter A. We will deny the petition.
STATEMENT OF THECASE AND FACTS
In April 2006, then sixteen-year-old petitionergave birth to A. in Garden Grove, California. At the time of A.'s birth,petitioner was living with her boyfriend Anthony, A.'s father, in San Jose andwas attending school. 12 days after A.'s birth, petitioner and A. returned toTijuana, Mexico to the home of petitioner's mother, Josefina, where theyremained until August 19 when they returned to Modesto accompanied by Anthonyand Anthony's 17-year-old sister Diana to visit Raul, Anthony and Diana'sfather.
On August 30, petitioner took thenfour-month-old A. to an emergency room in Madera where A. was admitted forrectal bleeding as well as perianal tearing and perianal bruising suggestive ofsexual abuse. Sexual abuse was confirmed by a child abuse specialist, whodocumented perianal lacerations at â€
| Description | Petitioner, a minor and Mexican national, seeks extraordinary writ review (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.450 8.452 [formerly rule 38 - 38.1]) through her guardian ad litem, of respondent court's orders denying her reunification services and setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearingas to her infant daughter. Court deny the petition. |
| Rating |
