P. v. Battle
Filed 2/15/07 P. v. Battle CA4/2
NOT TO BEPUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
CaliforniaRules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing orrelying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, exceptas specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified forpublication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OFAPPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATEDISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
RAYNARD BATTLE,
Defendant and Appellant.
|
E040404
(Super.Ct.No. RIF110205)
OPINION
|
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. J.Thompson Hanks and Roger A. Luebs, Judges. Affirmed.
Jason R. Frye, underappointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance forPlaintiff and Respondent.
On May 30, 2003, pursuant to Penal Code section 1192.5, and in accordance with the plea bargain, defendant pledguilty to count 1 (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)) and count 4 (Pen. Code, §273a, subd. (b)) of the felony complaint filed by the Riverside County DistrictAttorney. The negotiated dispositionallowed for the remaining charges and allegations to be dismissed and strickenpursuant to Penal Code section 1385.
Thereafter, on September 27, 2003, defendant was placed on a formal grant of probation for three years oncondition he spend 365 days in the local jail. The terms and conditions of hisgrant of probation included an order â€
| Description | On May 30, 2003, pursuant to Penal Code section 1192.5, and in accordance with the plea bargain, defendant pledguilty to count 1 (Pen. Code, S 273.5, subd. (a)) and count 4 (Pen. Code, S 273a, subd. (b)) of the felony complaint filed by the Riverside County DistrictAttorney. The negotiated dispositionallowed for the remaining charges and allegations to be dismissed and strickenpursuant to Penal Code section 1385. Court have concluded independent review of the record and find no arguable issues. The judgment isaffirmed. |
| Rating |
