P. v. Pearl
Filed 3/20/06 P. v. Pearl CA1/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DANIEL JOSEPH PEARL, Defendant and Appellant. | A110346 (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. SF334666A) |
The magistrate conducting the preliminary examination of defendant Daniel Joseph Pearl denied his motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5, and ordered him held to answer on a number of drug‑related felony charges. After an information was filed, defendant renewed his suppression motion, and he also filed a motion pursuant to Penal Code section 995 to set aside the information on the ground he had been held to answer on the basis of evidence derived from a constitutionally-tainted search. After the trial court denied both motions, defendant entered pleas of no contest to charges of possessing more than one kilogram of cocaine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11351, 11370.4, subd. (a)(1)), possessing â€
