legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Cochran CA1/4

nhaleem's Membership Status

Registration Date: Aug 17, 2021
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 08:17:2021 - 16:49:06

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
In re Skyla G. CA2/1
P. v. Ariaz CA2/7
In re Marcus P. CA2/7
P. v. Johnson CA2/2
P. v. Escobar-Lopez CA1/4

Find all listings submitted by nhaleem
In re Cochran CA1/4
By
05:10:2022

Filed 3/30/22 In re Cochran CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

In re BRANDON DARVILLE COCHRAN,

on Habeas Corpus.

A162309

(Solano County

Super. Ct. No. VCR230598)

Brandon Darville Cochran filed a habeas corpus petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial where a jury convicted him of voluntary manslaughter and found he personally used a firearm in the fatal shooting of the victim. Cochran also filed a direct appeal of the judgment raising related arguments. Because the appeal and habeas petition involve related issues, we ordered that we would consider them together. For the reasons set forth in the opinion in the related direct appeal (People v. Cochran, A160672), the habeas petition is denied.

POLLAK, P. J. ____________________ Date

BROWN, J.

STREETER, J.





Description Brandon Darville Cochran filed a habeas corpus petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial where a jury convicted him of voluntary manslaughter and found he personally used a firearm in the fatal shooting of the victim. Cochran also filed a direct appeal of the judgment raising related arguments. Because the appeal and habeas petition involve related issues, we ordered that we would consider them together. For the reasons set forth in the opinion in the related direct appeal (People v. Cochran, A160672), the habeas petition is denied.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 3 views. Averaging 3 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale