Fear Not Law Articles: In re Ayla M.

In re Ayla M

In re Ayla M.

Filed 1/17/07 In re Ayla M. CA1/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re AYLA M., et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

MENDOCINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

BONNIE M., et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

A112720

(Mendocino County

Super. Ct. Nos. JVSQ0413906,

JVSQ0413907, JVSQ0413908,

JVSQ0413909)

I. INTRODUCTION

Mother and Father appeal from the juvenile court's order terminating their parental rights and ordering adoption as the permanent plan for the four children involved in this appeal. Mother and Father both argue that the juvenile court erred in finding that the â€

Description	Mother and Father appeal from the juvenile court's order terminating their parental rights and ordering adoption as the permanent plan for the four children involved in this appeal. Mother and Father both argue that the juvenile court erred in finding that the "sibling relationship exception" set out in Welfare and Institutions code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(e), did not apply and, therefore, did not preclude the termination of their parental rights. Mother further contends that the juvenile court erred because it did not take into account the wishes of the oldest child, pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B). Court disagree and affirm the order.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.