Filed 4/7/22 P. v. Wright CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
FREDERICK WRIGHT,
Defendant and Appellant.
|
F082939
(Super. Ct. No. BF182048B)
OPINION |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Eric Bradshaw, Judge.
Richard L. Fitzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Appointed counsel for defendant Frederick Wright asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Defendant did not respond. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm.
BACKGROUND[1]
On August 12, 2020, the Kern County District Attorney filed a 20-count complaint alleging various charges against defendant and two other defendants.
On April 15, 2021, defendant pled no contest to second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 212.5, subd. (c);[2] count 1) and active participation in a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (a); count 20), and he admitted a firearm allegation as to count 1 (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)), in return for a prison term of nine years eight months.
On May 13, 2021, the trial court sentenced defendant to the agreed-upon sentence of nine years eight months, as follows: on count 1, the upper term of five years, plus a four-year firearm enhancement; on count 20, eight months (one-third the midterm). The court imposed a concurrent two-year term in another case. The court awarded credits and imposed various fines and fees.
On June 16, 2021, defendant filed a notice of appeal.
DISCUSSION
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel or any other arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
* Before Hill, P. J., Levy, J. and Meehan, J.
[1] Counsel stipulated to a factual basis in this case (the record does not contain a factual summary).
[2] All statutory references are to the Penal Code.
