EUREKA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT v. CITY OF EUREKA...
EUREKA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT v. CITY OF EUREKA PART II
EUREKA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT v. CITY OF EUREKA PART II 02:22:2007
EUREKA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT v
EUREKA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT v. CITY OF EUREKA
Filed 1/8/07; part. pub. & mod. order 2/1/07 (see end of opn.)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
EUREKA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT et al.,
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
CITY OF EUREKA et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
A113289
(HumboldtCounty
Super. Ct. No. CV050270)
EUREKACHURCH OF THE NAZARENE et al.,
Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.
STORY CONTINUED FROM PART I………
ii.) Historical Resource Impact
Appellants assert that the City failed to analyze the impact of the Project on the â€
Description
Fact that initial draft of EIR was prepared by counsel for applicants did not render it "biased and legally inadequate" where it was reviewed and modified by agency staff, closely scrutinized by independent consultants, and adopted in final form as reflecting the judgment of the agency. Agency's findings on noise impact, aesthetic, and safety issues were entitled to deference and were sufficient where explained in EIR.
