MEDEIROS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
Filed
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF Respondent; HEALTH Real Parties in Interest. | No. B193042 (Super. |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for writ of mandate. Bert Glennon, Jr., Judge. Petition granted; peremptory writ issued.
Shernoff Bidart & Darras, Michael J. Bidart, Ricardo Echeverria; The Ehrlich Law Firm and Jeffrey Isaac Ehrlich for Petitioners.
No appearance for Respondent.
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Raul L. Martinez and Elise D. Klein for Real Parties In Interest.
________________________________________
In this writ proceeding, petitioners Mary and Lee Medeiros (collectively, Medeiros) challenge the trial court's order compelling them to arbitrate a dispute with their health insurer, real party in interest Health Net.[1] Medeiros contends the arbitration provision at issue is unenforceable because it does not comply with the disclosure requirements set forth in Health and Safety Code section 1363.1.[2] Health Net asserts, as a member of a group health plan negotiated between Health Net and Medeiros's employer, Medeiros is not entitled to the protection of these disclosures. Moreover, Health Net argues the requirements of section 1363.1 do not apply to the â€