legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Bailey

Marriage of Bailey
02:22:2007

Marriage of Bailey


Marriage of Bailey


Filed 2/20/07  Marriage of Bailey CA1/3


 


 


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION THREE










In re the Marriage of CECILY BAILEY and RICHARD BAILEY.


RICHARD BAILEY,


            Appellant,


v.


CECILY BAILEY,


            Respondent.


            A115119


            (Contra Costa County


              Super. Ct. No. D04-02765)



            This is an appeal from two orders issued by the trial court in a marital dissolution case.  Appellant Richard Bailey appeals from (1)  an order finding certain real property acquired during the parties' marriage, the parties' former house, to be the separate property of respondent (order), and (2)  a subsequent order on appellant's motion to vacate the order that, among other things, left in effect the trial court's finding regarding the house (subsequent order) (collectively, the orders).  Appellant filed his opening brief on December 29, 2006.


            Respondent Cecily Bailey has moved to dismiss the appeal.  She has not yet filed a respondent's brief.  In her motion to dismiss, she contends that, under the â€





Description This is an appeal from two orders issued by the trial court in a marital dissolution case. Appellant Richard Bailey appeals from (1) an order finding certain real property acquired during the parties' marriage, the parties' former house, to be the separate property of respondent (order), and (2) a subsequent order on appellant's motion to vacate the order that, among other things, left in effect the trial court's finding regarding the house (subsequent order) (collectively, the orders). Appellant filed his opening brief on December 29, 2006.
we decline appellant's request to treat the appeal as a petition for extraordinary writ within its original jurisdiction. Appellant may appeal the trial court's findings regarding the parties' ownership interest in the house along with any other findings regarding the parties' property once a final judgment has issued.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale