legal news


Register | Forgot Password

JONES v. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST

JONES v. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST
02:22:2007

JONES v


JONES v. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST


Filed 1/31/07


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION


 


COPY


 


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(San Joaquin)







JOY R. JONES,


          Plaintiff and Appellant,


     v.


CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST et al.,


          Defendants and Respondents.



C052039


(Super. Ct. No. CV023625)



     APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, Carter Holly, J.  Reversed.


     Jay-Allen Eisen, C. Athena Roussos; Law Offices of Kenneth N. Meleyco and Kenneth N. Meleyco for Plaintiff and Appellant.


     Low McKinley Baleria, Donna W. Low, Joseph M. Weber and Paul R. Baleria for Defendants and Respondents.


     Plaintiff Joy R. Jones sued defendants Catholic Healthcare West and St. Joseph's Medical Center (St. Joseph's) for personal injuries she suffered while hospitalized in May 2002.  Defendants moved for summary judgment on grounds Jones's action was barred by the statute of limitations set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5,[1] and the purported notice of intent to sue which Jones faxed to St. Joseph's president on February 2, 2004, did not extend the time within which to file an action against defendants.  The court granted summary judgment and Jones appeals. 


     Jones argues her complaint was timely as a matter of law because:  (1) the parties entered into a series of tolling agreements that extended the one-year statute of limitations under section 340.5 through January 31, 2004; and (2) her February 2, 2004, letter of intent to sue effectively tolled the statute of limitations for 90 days based on the plain language of section 364.  Jones does not challenge the portion of the court's ruling that there were triable issues of fact whether an earlier letter constituted a notice of intent to sue, as argued by defendants.  However, she emphasizes the correctness of that ruling as a back-up argument.  We conclude the trial court misconstrued section 364 and erred in granting defendants' motion for summary judgment. 


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND


     On May 20, 2002, Jones underwent total hip replacement surgery at St. Joseph's.  While hospitalized following surgery, Jones fell in her hospital room on May 21, 2002, and suffered injuries to her jaw and teeth.  Her complaint alleges the fall was caused by the nursing staff's negligence. 


     On May 6, 2003, Jones sent a letter to Don Wiley, the president of St. Joseph's Medical Center, describing the circumstances surrounding the fall and asking the hospital to â€





Description Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 364, which extends the one year period in which to sue a health care provider by 90 days where the plaintiff has given timely notice of intent to sue, permits the notice of intent to be served by fax. Code provisions limiting fax service of certain documents to cases in which the parties have agreed to such service do not apply to prelitigation notices.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale