Filed 6/22/22 P. v. Dunn CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
| THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
TEMAN TAKOA DUNN,
Defendant and Appellant.
| 2d Crim. No. B318043 (Super. Ct. No. 20F-00015) (San Luis Obispo County) |
Teman Takoa Dunn appeals from the judgment sentencing him to state prison after he admitted violating probation. The appeal is based on the sentence and does not affect the validity of the plea or admission of the probation violation. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b)(2)(B).)
In 2019, Dunn stole food from a supermarket. He pleaded no contest to a felony violation of petty theft with a prior robbery conviction. (Pen. Code, § 666, subd. (a).) In January 2021, he was placed on two years formal probation. In December 2021, he admitted violating his probation based on a new conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol.
In the driving under the influence case (case 21F-04501), the court sentenced Dunn to the lower term of 16 months in state prison, doubled for a prior strike for a total of two years, eight months.[1] In the probation violation case (case 20F-00015), the court imposed a concurrent prison sentence of two years.
We appointed counsel to represent Dunn in this appeal. After counsel examined the record, he filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues. On May 10, 2022, appointed counsel advised Dunn by mail that he had 30 days within which to file a supplemental brief. We have not received a response.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Dunn’s attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441-443.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
TANGEMAN, J.
We concur:
YEGAN, J.
PERREN, J.
Jesse J. Marino, Judge
Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo
______________________________
Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
[1] We affirm the judgment in 21F-04501 in a separate opinion (People v. Teman Takoa Dunn, B318041).
