legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Apodaca

P. v. Apodaca
02:24:2007

P


 


P. v. Apodaca


Filed 2/21/07  P. v. Apodaca CA5


 


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT







THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


                        v.


RICKY APODACA,


Defendant and Appellant.



F048609


(Super. Ct. No. 28659)


OPINION


            APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County.  Frank Dougherty, Judge.


            Jerome P. Wallingford, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


            Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Brian Alvarez and Kathleen A. McKenna, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


-ooOoo-


Procedural summary


            Appellant Ricky Apodaca was convicted by jury trial of the first degree murder of Keith Gooding, with the special circumstance of robbery.  (Pen. Code,[1] §§  187, 190.2, subd.  (a)(17)(A).)  The jury also found that Apodaca had intentionally and personally discharged a firearm in the commission of the murder (§  12022.53, subd.  (d)), had personally used a firearm in the commission of the murder (§  12022.5, subd.  (a)[2]), and had committed the murder during the commission of a robbery (§§  211, subd.  (a), 212.5).  Apodaca was sentenced to life without parole for the murder, plus an additional consecutive 25-years-to-life term for the section  12022.53, subdivision  (d), enhancement, and an additional consecutive 10-year term for the section  12022.5, subdivision  (a), enhancement. 


Factual summary


            On the morning of July  16, 2003, at approximately 5:45 a.m., Keith Gooding drove his Silverado pickup truck to the 7-11 located on Loughborough Drive in Merced for coffee.  This was Gooding's normal daily routine.  After purchasing his coffee, Gooding would drive to his business, arriving at approximately 6:00 a.m. to open his shop.  On the same morning, Malcolm Person was clerking at the 7-11.  Person was familiar with Gooding, who was a regular customer.  Person also knew Apodaca by name and knew Apodaca's family.  The morning of July  16, Apodaca came into the store shortly after Gooding.  When Gooding was outside the store talking on his cell phone, Apodaca told Person that he was going to â€





Description Appellant was convicted by jury trial of the first degree murder of Keith Gooding, with the special circumstance of robbery. (Pen. Code, SS 187, 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(A).) The jury also found that Apodaca had intentionally and personally discharged a firearm in the commission of the murder (S 12022.53, subd. (d)), had personally used a firearm in the commission of the murder (S 12022.5, subd. (a)), and had committed the murder during the commission of a robbery (SS 211, subd. (a), 212.5). Apodaca was sentenced to life without parole for the murder, plus an additional consecutive 25 years to life term for the section 12022.53, subdivision (d), enhancement, and an additional consecutive 10-year term for the section 12022.5, subdivision (a), enhancement. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale