legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.F.

In re K.F.
02:25:2007

In re K.F.

In re K


In re K.F.


Filed 1/31/07  In re K.F. CA3


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


 


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(Sacramento)


----










In re K.F., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


THE PEOPLE,


          Plaintiff and Respondent,


     v.


K.F.,


          Defendant and Appellant.



C052462


(Super. Ct. No. JV121561)



     Following a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court sustained charges that 15-year-old K.F. drove without a license, a misdemeanor, at an unsafe speed for conditions, an infraction.  (Veh. Code, §§ 12500, subd. (a), 22350.)  K.F. was placed on six months probation and ordered to perform 36 hours of community service, pay a $25 restitution fine and make restitution to the victim in the amount of $952.84. 


     K.F.'s sole contention on appeal is that the restitution award is not supported by substantial evidence.  We affirm the judgment.


Facts and Proceedings


     On the afternoon of May 29, 2005, K.F. was driving a go-cart when he lost control and hit the victim's car.  The victim had just parked her car and was standing in the entryway of her home when she heard â€





Description Following a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court sustained charges that 15-year-old K.F. drove without a license, a misdemeanor, at an unsafe speed for conditions, an infraction. (Veh. Code, SS 12500, subd. (a), 22350.) K.F. was placed on six months probation and ordered to perform 36 hours of community service, pay a $25 restitution fine and make restitution to the victim in the amount of $952.84.
Plaintiff"s sole contention on appeal is that the restitution award is not supported by substantial evidence. Court affirm the judgment.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale