P. v. Lueck
Filed 3/21/06 P. v. Lueck CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES RICHARD LUECK, Defendant and Appellant. |
F048217
(Super. Ct. No. F03907782-7)
O P I N I O N |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Dale Ikeda, Judge.
Matthew Alger, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Without raising any issues on appeal, James Richard Lueck (Appellant) asks this court to conduct an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.
According to preliminary hearing testimony, Fresno Police Officer Art Rodriguez and three fellow officers went to visit Appellant regarding reports of narcotics transactions taking place at his home. Appellant reluctantly agreed to let the officers in his residence, telling Officer Rodriguez that if he found anything â€
