Landau v. Medical Bd. of
Filed
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
ALLYN BETH LANDAU, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MEDICAL BOARD OF Defendant and Respondent. | C048760 (Super. Ct. No. 02CS01802) |
In 1996, defendant Medical Board of California (the Board) revoked the medical license of plaintiff Allyn Beth Landau, a dermatologist. Plaintiff petitioned for reinstatement of her license in 1999 (see Bus. and Prof. Code, § 2307; unspecified statutory references that follow are to the Business and Professions Code), but the Board rejected her application and the trial court denied her subsequent petition for administrative mandamus.
In this appeal, plaintiff contends the Board erred in denying her petition for reinstatement. We reverse and remand the matter to the Board for further consideration.
Facts and Proceedings
Plaintiff was a dermatologist with a solo practice in San Francisco. In 1993, the Board sought to revoke plaintiff's license for violations of the Medical Practices Act (§ 2000 et seq.) in the care and treatment of two patients in 1986 and 1987. Hearings were held in September 1995, and the Board concluded that plaintiff's â€
