legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Salazar v. Salazar CA3

NB's Membership Status

Registration Date: Dec 09, 2020
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 12:09:2020 - 10:59:08

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
Xian v. Sengupta CA1/1
McBride v. National Default Servicing Corp. CA1/1
P. v. Franklin CA1/3
Epis v. Bradley CA1/4
In re A.R. CA6

Find all listings submitted by NB
Salazar v. Salazar CA3
By
06:07:2023

Filed 8/15/22 Salazar v. Salazar CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

ISRAEL C. SALAZAR,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

RICARDO SALAZAR, as Trustee, etc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

C092727

(Super. Ct. No. 34-2018-00246743-PR-TR-FRC)

In a signed order filed on December 6, 2019, the trial court denied appellant Israel C. Salazar’s petition challenging the validity of a living trust. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from that order on August 25, 2020.

Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 180 days after the trial court’s appealable order was filed, the notice of appeal is untimely. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.104(a)(1)(C), (e).) Because we have no jurisdiction to consider this untimely appeal, we dismiss it on our own motion. (See In re G.C. (2020) 8 Cal.5th 1119, 1127; Faunce v. Cate (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 166, 170.)

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed. Respondent Ricardo Salazar is awarded his costs on appeal. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.278(a)(1), (2).)

/s/

HOCH, J.

We concur:

/s/

DUARTE, Acting P. J.

/s/

EARL, J.





Description In a signed order filed on December 6, 2019, the trial court denied appellant Israel C. Salazar’s petition challenging the validity of a living trust. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from that order on August 25, 2020.
Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 180 days after the trial court’s appealable order was filed, the notice of appeal is untimely. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.104(a)(1)(C), (e).) Because we have no jurisdiction to consider this untimely appeal, we dismiss it on our own motion. (See In re G.C. (2020) 8 Cal.5th 1119, 1127; Faunce v. Cate (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 166, 170.)
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 28 views. Averaging 28 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale