legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Diaz CA5

NB's Membership Status

Registration Date: Dec 09, 2020
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 12:09:2020 - 10:59:08

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
Xian v. Sengupta CA1/1
McBride v. National Default Servicing Corp. CA1/1
P. v. Franklin CA1/3
Epis v. Bradley CA1/4
In re A.R. CA6

Find all listings submitted by NB
In re Diaz CA5
By
06:21:2023

Filed 8/18/22 In re Diaz CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re

ANTONIO DIAZ,

On Habeas Corpus.

F084549

(Kern Super. Ct. No. SF019775B)

OPINION

THE COURT*

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Central California Appellate Program and Bradley A. Bristow, for Petitioner.

-ooOoo-

Petitioner seeks permission to file a belated notice of appeal under the doctrine of constructive filing. (In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 72, 81–82.) The Attorney General was provided the opportunity to respond and was notified that “[t]he failure to file a response shall be deemed agreement that petitioner should be granted, without further proceedings, a belated appeal.” The time to respond has elapsed, and the Attorney General did not provide a response. Petitioner, in his declaration, provided his statements under the penalty of perjury regarding his conversations near the time of sentencing during which counsel agreed to file a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, we conclude petitioner is entitled to relief.

DISPOSITION

Petitioner is granted leave to file a notice of appeal on or before 60 days from the date of this order in Kern County Superior Court action No. SF019775B.

Let a writ of mandate issue directing the Clerk of the Kern County Superior Court to file said request in its action No. SF019775B, to treat it as timely filed, and to proceed with the preparation of the record on appeal in accordance with the applicable rules of the California Rules of Court if the clerk of that court receives said request on or before 60 days of the date of this order.

This opinion is final forthwith as to this court.


* Before Detjen, Acting P. J., Smith, J. and DeSantos, J.





Description THE COURT*
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Central California Appellate Program and Bradley A. Bristow, for Petitioner.
-ooOoo-
Petitioner seeks permission to file a belated notice of appeal under the doctrine of constructive filing. (In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 72, 81–82.) The Attorney General was provided the opportunity to respond and was notified that “[t]he failure to file a response shall be deemed agreement that petitioner should be granted, without further proceedings, a belated appeal.” The time to respond has elapsed, and the Attorney General did not provide a response. Petitioner, in his declaration, provided his statements under the penalty of perjury regarding his conversations near the time of sentencing during which counsel agreed to file a notice of appeal.
Accordingly, we conclude petitioner is entitled to relief.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 60 views. Averaging 60 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale