In re T.L
Filed 3/21/06 In re T.L. CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
In re T.L. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DION L., Defendant and Appellant. | E037925 (Super.Ct.Nos. J181468, J181469) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Patrick J. Morris, Judge. Dismissed.
Leslie A. Barry, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Dion L.
Ronald D. Reitz, County Counsel, and Dawn M. Messer, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Sharon S. Rollo, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minors.
In this dependency proceeding, the daughters of Dion L. (mother), including V.L. and T.L., were removed from her custody. At an 18-month review hearing, the juvenile court ordered that V. and T. remain in long-term foster care. The mother appeals from a subsequent order, reducing her visitation with them from once a week to once a month. Just two months after that, however, the juvenile court suspended visitation entirely. Accordingly, we will dismiss this appeal as moot.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The mother and her husband (the father) have three daughters ‑‑ C.L., V.L., and T.L. In 2002, C. reported that the father was supplying her with alcohol, â€