In re Aaron D.
Filed
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
In re AARON D., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B190256 ( Super. |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AARON D., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Charles Scarlett, Judge. Modified and affirmed.
Phillip I. Bronson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Steven D. Matthews and David E. Madeo, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Minor Aaron D. appeals from the order of wardship entered by the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 following a finding that he had committed three counts of robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.) He was placed in the camp/community program for a period of six months. He appeals, contending that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the finding that he participated in the robberies, (2) his counsel's failure to object to the hearsay statements of two witnesses constituted ineffective assistance of counsel, and (3) the court erred in imposing probation conditions restricting his association with anyone disapproved of by his parents or his probation officer and prohibiting his participation in any type of gang activity. We modify the terms of probation and affirm the juvenile court order.
FACTUAL
On
Frank T., Eben T., and Franklin A. were walking on