In re Hamid P.
Filed 2/5/07 In re Hamid P. CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
In re HAMID P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B186309 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YJ26900) |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HAMID P., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
Irma J. Brown, Judge. Affirmed as modified.
Anne E. Fragasso, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Victoria B. Wilson and Juliet H. Swoboda, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Pursuant to a plea agreement following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, Hamid P. admitted he had unlawfully possessed a weapon on school grounds (Pen. Code, § 626.10, subd. (a))[1] and was declared a ward of the juvenile court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) and placed home on probation subject to various terms and conditions. On appeal Hamid contends the weapon (described in the delinquency petition as a â€
