legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v. PALMER PART-II

PEOPLE v. PALMER PART-II
02:27:2007

PEOPLE v. PALMER




Filed 8/31/06




CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT



(Plumas)



----








THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


REX EVANS PALMER,


Defendant and Appellant.





C049018



(Super. Ct. No. 0228980)





Continue from Part I ………



We respectfully decline to follow the Tighe, supra, 266 F.3d 1187, majority opinion and follow the reasoning of Bowden. Similar reasoning applicable to the use of a prior juvenile adjudication to which no right to a jury trial attached applies here to the use of a prior Nevada misdemeanor driving-under-the-influence conviction to which no right to a jury trial attached. Nevada's misdemeanor driving-under-the-influence statute provides for a maximum prison term of six months or less and requires no jury trial since the offense is considered a petty offense (NRS § 484.3792, subds. 1(a)(2), (1)(b)(1)(I); see Appendix III, post; Blanton v. North Las Vegas (1989) 489 U.S. 538 [103 L.Ed.2d 550]). â€





Description Defendant's sentence for California DUI conviction was properly enhanced by previous Nevada DUI convictions even though defendant did not have a right to a jury trial in the Nevada proceedings.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale