legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hernandez

P. v. Hernandez
02:28:2007

P


P. v. Hernandez


Filed 2/6/07  P. v. Hernandez CA2/5


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION FIVE







THE PEOPLE,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


            v.


ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ,


            Defendant and Appellant.



      B193474


      (Los Angeles County


      Super. Ct. No. KA075151)


            APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, George Genesta, Judge.  Affirmed.


            William D. Farber, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


            No appearance for plaintiff and respondent.


___________________________


            Defendant, Enrique Hernandez, appeals after a jury convicted him of methamphetamine possession in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a).  Defendant admitted he had sustained one prior serious or violent felony conviction or juvenile adjudication as alleged pursuant to Penal Code[1] sections 667, subdivisions (b) through (i) and 1170.12.  On August 31, 2006, defendant was sentenced to the low term of 16 months which was doubled pursuant to sections 667, subdivisions (b) through (i) and 1170.12.  Defendant was awarded 153 days of custody credits consisting of 102 days of actual days plus 51 days of conduct credits.  Defendant filed a notice of appeal. 


            We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal.  After examination of the record, appointed appellate counsel filed an â€





Description Defendant,appeals after a jury convicted him of methamphetamine possession in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a). Defendant admitted he had sustained one prior serious or violent felony conviction or juvenile adjudication as alleged pursuant to Penal Code sections 667, subdivisions (b) through (i) and 1170.12. On August 31, 2006, defendant was sentenced to the low term of 16 months which was doubled pursuant to sections 667, subdivisions (b) through (i) and 1170.12. Defendant was awarded 153 days of custody credits consisting of 102 days of actual days plus 51 days of conduct credits. Defendant filed a notice of appeal.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that defense counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities. No argument now exists favorable to defendant on appeal. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284; People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale