Butler v. Sup.
Filed
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
DAVID BUTLER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF Respondent; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Real Parties in Interest. | B195851 (L.A.S.C. No. TS009667) OPINION GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for writ of mandate. William Barry, Judge. Petition granted.
Law Offices of Benjamin P. Wasserman and Benjamin P. Wasserman for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Pollak, Vida & Fisher, Daniel P. Barer, Hamed Amiri Ghaemmaghami; Maranga Morgenstern, Kenneth A. Maranga and Allison E. Barrett for Real Parties in Interest.
___________________________
The trial court abused its discretion in denying David Butler's petition for an order relieving him from the provisions of Government Code section 945.4. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of mandate. [1]
FACTUAL
David Butler (Butler) was involved in a motorcycle accident on
On
On
On
On May 9, Butler's counsel filed an application to file a late claim. In that document, Butler's counsel states that â€