P. v. Carter
Filed 1/22/07 P. v. Carter CA1/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RICK WALLACE CARTER, Defendant and Appellant. | A114723 (Marin County Super. Ct. No. SC146296) |
Counsel appointed for defendant Rick Wallace Carter has asked this court to independently examine the record in accordance with People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, to determine if there are any arguable issues that require briefing. Counsel advises that defendant was apprised of his right to file a supplemental brief, but defendant has not elected to exercise that right. We have conducted our review, conclude there are no arguable issues, and affirm.
The record shows that on February 27, 2006, the District Attorney of Marin County filed a complaint charging defendant with one count of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), and one count of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a).) It was also alleged that defendant had two prior burglary convictions, one of which qualified as serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code sections 667 and 1170.12. On May 5, 2006, the date set for the preliminary examination, defendant changed his not guilty pleas to guilty, and admitted the enhancement allegation that he had a â€
