Ryland v. Iversen
Filed 2/9/07 Ryland v. Iversen CA4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Placer)
----
CHRISTINE L. RYLAND et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, v. JUDY K. IVERSEN et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants. | C051684 (Super. Ct. No. SCV9847) |
Defendants appeal from the trial court's judgment declaring the existence of an express easement across the edge of their property. We affirm.
FACTS
This is a judgment roll appeal. Thus, the sufficiency of evidence supporting the judgment is not an issue before us. We presume there is substantial evidence to support the findings and do not look beyond the facts appearing in the findings. (Williams v. Inglewood Board of Realtors (1963) 219 Cal.App.2d 479, 481-482.)
Plaintiffs and defendants reside along South Lakewood Drive in the Placer County town of Meadow Vista. Many years ago, what is now South Lakewood Drive was referred to as a â€
