In re X.L.

Filed 1/23/07  In re X.L. CA2/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN TX.L. CA2/2HE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

            APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.  D. Zeke Zeidler, Juvenile Court Referee.  Affirmed.

            Michael A. Salazar, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant C. L.

            Sharon S. Rollo, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant M. L.

            Aida Aslanian, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for X. L., Minor.

            Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, Kim Nemoy, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* * * * * *

            Minor, X. L., her mother (Mother) and father (Father) appeal the trial court's order continuing detention of X. L. away from her parents made after a six-month review hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.21, subdivision (e).^[1]  The court found that returning her to the parents' custody posed a risk of detriment to her safety.  We find that the trial court's order is supported by substantial evidence and affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND STATEMENT OF THE CASE

            We include the statement of facts from our prior decision affirming the juvenile court's assertion of jurisdiction over and detention of X. L. and adopt it here as follows.  (In re X. L. (September 26, 2006, B187398) [nonpub. opn.].)

â€