Fear Not Law Articles: R.R.K vs. STATE OF FLORIDA

R.R.K vs. STATE OF FLORIDA

Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC05-1733

____________

R.R.K., etc.,

Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

[February 8, 2007]

PER CURIAM.

We have for review R.R.K. v. State, 912 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (on motions for rehearing and certification), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified the same question as was then pending review in this Court via V.K.E. v. State, 902 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), quashed, 934 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 2006). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We have since answered the certified question in a manner contrary to the decision presently on review. See V.K.E. v. State, 934 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 2006). We have thus determined, and respondent agrees, that we should exercise our jurisdiction to grant the petition for review, quash the decision under review, and remand to the Fifth District Court of Appeal for reconsideration upon application of this Court's decision in V.K.E.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur in result only.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF FILED, DETERMINED.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified Great Public Importance

Fifth District - Case No. 5D04-1437

(Marion County)

James S. Purdy, Public Defender and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida,

for Petitioner

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida,

for Respondent

Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.

Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line attorney.

- 2 -

Description	Court have for review R.R.K. v. State, 912 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (on motions for rehearing and certification), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified the same question as was then pending review in this Court via V.K.E. v. State, 902 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), quashed, 934 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 2006). Court have since answered the certified question in a manner contrary to the decision presently on review. See V.K.E. v. State, 934 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 2006). Court have thus determined, and respondent agrees, that court should exercise its jurisdiction to grant the petition for review, quash the decision under review, and remand to the Fifth District Court of Appeal for reconsideration upon application of this Court's decision in V.K.E. It is so ordered.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.