legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re T.W.

In re T.W.
03:14:2007





In re T





 


 


 


In re T.W.


 


 


 


 


Filed 1/29/07  In re
T.W. CA4/2


 


 


 


 


NOT TO BE
PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California
Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


 


 


IN THE COURT OF
APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


 


FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT


 


DIVISION TWO


 


 


 
















In re T.W. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court
Law.



 



 


SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES,


 


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


 


v.


 


KATRINA S. et al.,


 


            Defendants and Appellants.


 



 


 


            E040992


 


             (Super.Ct.Nos.
J171298, J171299, J186232, & J193939)


 


            OPINION


 



 



 



 


            APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino
County
.  David Cohn, Judge.  Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and
remanded with directions.


            Leslie A. Barry, under
appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Frank S.


            Nicole Williams, under
appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Katrina S.


            Ruth E. Stringer,
Acting County Counsel, W. Andrew
Hartzell, Chief Deputy County Counsel, and Danielle E. Wuchenich, Deputy County
Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


            Ellen L. Bacon, under
appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minors.


            Katrina S. (Mother) appeals
from the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights to M. (born
in 1998), J. (born in 2000), A. (born in 2003), and T. (born in 2004), pursuant
to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1]  Frank S. (Father)
also appeals from the same order terminating his parental rights to J.  On
appeal, both parents challenge the finding that M. and J. are adoptable.[2] 
They further contend the notice requirements for complying with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) were not
satisfied as to J.


I.  PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND AND FACTS


            On September 13, 2000, the San Bernardino County Department of
Children's Services
(the â€





Description Mother appeals from the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights to M. (born in 1998), J. (born in 2000), A. (born in 2003), and T. (born in 2004), pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Frank S. (Father) also appeals from the same order terminating his parental rights to J. On appeal, both parents challenge the finding that M. and J. are adoptable. They further contend the notice requirements for complying with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) were not satisfied as to J.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale