City of Palm Springs v. Miller

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed 1/29/07  City
of Palm Springs v. Miller CA4/2

 

 

 

 

NOT TO BE
PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

 

California
Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

 

 

IN THE COURT OF
APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

 

FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT

 

DIVISION TWO

 

 

 

CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,               Plaintiff and Respondent,   v.   RONALD MILLER,               Defendant and Appellant.

E038681               (Super.Ct.No. INC011518)               OPINION

 

            APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County.  Christopher
J. Sheldon and Lawrence W. Fry, Judges.^[1]  Affirmed.

            Ronald Miller, in pro.
per., for Defendant and Appellant.

            Woodruff, Spradlin
& Smart and M. Lois Bobak, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

 

            The
City of Palm Springs (the â€