legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Bailhe v. Mercury Casualty Co.

Bailhe v. Mercury Casualty Co.
03:14:2007





Bailhe v





 


 


 


 


 


 


Bailhe v. Mercury Casualty Co. P. v. Mora


 


 


 


Filed
1/29/07  Bailhe v. Mercury Casualty Co. P. v. Mora CA2/1


 


 


 


 


NOT
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits
courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 977.


 


 


IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


 


SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT


 


DIVISION
ONE


 


 








JACQUES BAILHE,


 


            Plaintiff and
Appellant,


 


            v.


 


MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY et
al.,


 


            Defendants and
Respondents.


 



      B185508


 


      (Los Angeles County


      Super. Ct. No. LC064771)


 



 


 


 


            APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles
County
, Bert Glennon, Jr., Judge.  Affirmed.


 


            Law Offices of Patrick C. McGarrigle, Patrick C.
McGarrigle and Philip A. Zampiello for Plaintiff and Appellant.


 


            Hager & Dowling, Thomas J. Dowling and
Jessica M. Johnson for Defendants and Respondents.


 


______________________________


 


            This is a third
party bad faith case against an insurer.  We reject the plaintiff's claims of
error and affirm a judgment in favor of the insurer.


 


FACTS


A.


            On February 27, 1998, Jacques Bailhe and Jason Brenna had an automobile accident.  In December, Bailhe sued Brenna for
property damage.  Brenna's insurer, Mercury Casualty Company, retained counsel
for Brenna (Marc Levine) and provided a defense. 


 


            Before trial, Mercury sent Bailhe two checks,
one in June 1998 for $4,712.01, the other in November 1998 for $3,960.[1]  The November check
had a box with the following notation:


 



                        IN FULL
SETTLEMENT OF P.D. CLAIMS ARISING


                        OUT
OF AN INCIDENT ON FEBRUARY 27, 1998



 


            On June 28, 2001, the dispute was tried to the court (Hon. Barry A. Taylor), and a judgment was rendered in favor of Bailhe
in the amount of $12,109.50 ($3,767.59 for a replacement car rental, $2,179.81
for repairs to Bailhe's car, $1,000 for â€





Description On February 27, 1998, Jacques Bailhe and Jason Brenna had an automobile accident. In December, Bailhe sued Brenna for property damage. Brenna's insurer, Mercury Casualty Company, retained counsel for Brenna (Marc Levine) and provided a defense.
Before trial, Mercury sent Bailhe two checks, one in June 1998 for $4,712.01, the other in November 1998 for $3,960. The November check had a box with the following notation: IN FULL SETTLEMENT OF P.D. CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF AN INCIDENT ON FEBRUARY 27, 1998
On August 22, Judge Marcus heard argument on the order to show cause he had issued, then told the lawyers he thought it ought to be heard by Judge Taylor. On October 29, the order to show cause was heard by Judge Taylor, who on November 20 issued an order imposing monetary sanctions against Mercury (not Brenna or Levine), as follows: "After reviewing the papers submitted, and hearing oral argument of counsel, the court determined that Mercury . . . did not comply with the court's judgment dated June 29, 2001. As a result, sanctions shall be awarded against Mercury in the amount of $5,000, to be paid to [Bailhe], and sanctions in the amount of $1,000 to be paid to the court . . . ." The sanctions were paid as ordered.


Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale