legal news


Register | Forgot Password

THE COPLEY PRESS, INC v. SUPERIOR COURT Part - II

THE COPLEY PRESS, INC v. SUPERIOR COURT Part - II
03:14:2007

THE COPLEY PRESS, INC v. SUPERIOR COURT







Filed 8/31/06





IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA





THE COPLEY PRESS, INC., )


)


Petitioner, )


) S128603


v. )


) Ct.App. 4/1 D042251


THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN )


DIEGO COUNTY, )


) San Diego County


Respondent; ) Super. Ct. No. GIC807922


)


COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO et al., )


)


Real Parties in Interest. )


_______________________________________ )


Continue from Part I ………


To the extent this examination of the statutory language leaves uncertainty, it is appropriate to consider â€





Description California Public Records Act does not require disclosure to a newspaper publisher of records of county commission relating to a peace officer's administrative appeal of a disciplinary matter. Penal Code Sec. 832.7(a) which provides that certain peace officer records are confidential and shall not be disclosed in any criminal or civil proceeding except by discovery pursuant to Secs. 1043 and 1046 of the Evidence Code is not limited to criminal and civil proceedings. Commission records of disciplinary appeals, including the officer's name, are protected under Sec. 832.7. Sec. 832.7 is not unconstitutional for permitting nondisclosure of such records.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale