legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Currier

P. v. Currier
04:01:2007



P. v. Currier



Filed 3/19/07 P. v. Currier CA3



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT



(Trinity)



----



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



GEORGE JOE CURRIER,



Defendant and Appellant.



C053102



(Super. Ct. No. 06F060)



Pursuant to a negotiated settlement, defendant George Joe Currier pled guilty to welfare fraud (Welf. & Inst. Code,  10980, subd. (c)(2)) in exchange for the dismissal of other counts.



Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was granted probation for three years conditioned upon service of 360 days in county jail and payment of the following fines and/or fees: $100 fine plus penalty assessments; $200 fines in accordance with Penal Code sections 1202.4 and 1202.44; $6,987 in restitution plus an administrative fee; and $121 pursuant to Government Code section 29550.2.



FACTS



Investigation showed that defendant had been claiming welfare aid for a child not living with him and for cash and food stamps to which he was not entitled.



We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.



DISPOSITION



The judgment is affirmed.



CANTIL-SAKAUYE , J.



We concur:



BLEASE , Acting P.J.



MORRISON , J.



Publication Courtesy of California lawyer directory.



Analysis and review provided by Escondido Property line attorney.





Description Pursuant to a negotiated settlement, defendant George Joe Currier pled guilty to welfare fraud (Welf. & Inst. Code, 10980, subd. (c)(2)) in exchange for the dismissal of other counts.
Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was granted probation for three years conditioned upon service of 360 days in county jail and payment of the following fines and/or fees: $100 fine plus penalty assessments; $200 fines in accordance with Penal Code sections 1202.4 and 1202.44; $6,987 in restitution plus an administrative fee; and $121 pursuant to Government Code section 29550.2.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale