In re A.M.
An alleged father appeals to challenge the juvenile courts denial of his motion requesting all orders made at the detention, jurisdiction, disposition and review hearings be declared void for lack of jurisdiction. He also claims the court erred in denying his petition for modification without a hearing. In both his motion and petition the alleged father asserted he had not received notice of the proceedings because the department failed to exercise due diligence in attempting to locate him, and in addition, failed to use the Hague Service Convention to serve him despite knowledge he had been deported to Belize. Court affirm.
Comments on In re A.M.