In re Robin M.
This case is one of the many unfortunate cases that arise out of a volatile divorce between two parents who cannot set aside their conflicts for the sake of their child. As a result, the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) was forced to intervene, and the juvenile court was put in the precarious position of having to decide where the child should be placed. After considering a host of evidence regarding the child and the parents emotional states, the juvenile court determined that the child should be placed with her father.
Peggy M. (mother) appeals from that order. She contends that: (1) substantial evidence does not support the juvenile courts order removing the child, Robin M. (Robin), from her custody; (2) the juvenile courts order placing Robin with Scott M. (father) was erroneous; and (3) the juvenile court erred in admitting into evidence tape recordings of statements made by mother.
Court affirm.
Comments on In re Robin M.