Knit 2000 v. Unifi
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after a jury trial, challenging three evidentiary rulings, the denial of its motion for nonsuit on a cross-complaint, and the trial courts determination that defendants were the prevailing parties in awarding costs.
Court conclude that the evidentiary rulings and the denial of the nonsuit, even if in error, caused no prejudice. Further, where, as here, the defendant files a cross-complaint, and neither the plaintiff nor the defendant obtains any relief, the defendant is considered the prevailing party in awarding costs. Court therefore affirm.
Comments on Knit 2000 v. Unifi