Sturman v. Oshita
Appellant Patricia Koch Oshita appeals from an award of attorneys fees in the nature of a sanction entered in the dissolution action of her marriage to respondent Eugene Sturman. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering sanctions. Koch Oshita also appeals from an order requiring her to pay three quarters of the fees incurred by counsel appointed to represent the parties child. Koch Oshita raises no cognizable grounds for reversing this order. Court therefore affirm the order making both of these awards.
Comments on Sturman v. Oshita