diSibio v. Rosen, Bien & Asaro
The law firm of Rosen, Bien & Asaro, LLP (RB&A) sought and obtained summary judgment on a cross-complaint brought by its former clients, Lewis and Mary diSibio (the diSibios) alleging causes of action for equitable indemnity and constructive trust. Court affirm the summary judgment because the diSibios failed to establish any triable issue of material fact, and RB&A is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.
Comments on diSibio v. Rosen, Bien & Asaro