Mottaghi v. Tazerouni
Defendant Ali Tazerouni appeals from a judgment after default. He argues the trial court erred by denying his motion for relief from default and subsequent motion for reconsideration. He also challenges the judgment itself, arguing that plaintiff Natalie Mottaghis complaint did not provide him with sufficient notice and failed to state a prima facie case as to any cause of action. Finally, Tazerouni claims that the judgment would permit Mottaghi to recover twice. Court find that none of these contentions have merit and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Mottaghi v. Tazerouni