In re Robert H.
Robert H. appeals from orders terminating his parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to his three young children. He contends the court erred at an earlier stage of the dependency proceedings when it ruled the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq. (ICWA)) did not apply. He also claims the court should have found termination of his rights would be detrimental to the children based on their parent/child relationship ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)). On review, Court disagree with appellant and affirm.
Comments on In re Robert H.