Cruz v. Ayromloo
Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs in their action for wrongful eviction arising from their emergency evacuation from his rent-controlled building. Defendant contends the trial court erred in finding that he was required formally to evict the displaced tenants prior to re-renting the apartments, that his increased profits due to the re-renting of the units was not the proper measure of damages, and that his conduct did not cause the tenants emotional distress. The tenants cross-appeal, contending the trial court erred in failing to find defendants conduct was an unfair business practice under the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code, 17200, et seq.) or that his conduct constituted intentional infliction of emotional distress. Court affirm.
Comments on Cruz v. Ayromloo