P. v. Coyazo
Defendant Antonio Muratalla Coyazo was convicted of six counts involving the attempted murder, kidnapping and carjacking of one victim, and the robbery or attempted robbery of four others. He claims a number of errors, including the improper admission of his confession and hearsay evidence, the lack of sufficient evidence on several charges, and sentencing errors. The only contention with any merit is defendants claim that he was erroneously sentenced to the upper term pursuant to Cunningham v. California (2007) U.S. [127 S.Ct. 856] (Cunningham). The case is therefore remanded for a new sentencing hearing. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Coyazo