In re David R.
On May 15, 2006, the court readjudged appellant, David R., a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602) after it found true an allegation that he committed battery on an officer (Pen. Code, 243, subd. (b)). On May 31, 2006, the court committed David to juvenile hall for 90 days, to be served consecutively to his current commitment, set the maximum term of confinement as two years and two months, reimposed various probation conditions, and credited him with 389 days of predisposition custody credit.
On appeal, David contends the probation conditions prohibiting him from (1) associating with anyone unless approved of by his parents or probation officer and (2) possessing deadly or dangerous weaponsare constitutionally vague and overbroad. David also contends, and the People concede, he is entitled to an additional day of predisposition custody credit. As we shall explain, although we reject Davids contention with respect to the prohibition against possession of dangerous and deadly weapons, we conclude the other probation condition should be modified to expressly state that he must have knowledge of whom his parents or the probation officer disapprove. Court also agree that the predisposition custody credits must be modified.
Comments on In re David R.