legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gentry
A jury convicted defendant of one count of robbery, one count of dissuading a witness, and the personal use of a firearm in committing these offenses, all of which occurred in March 2001. (Pen. Code, 211; 136.1, subd.(c)(1); 1192.7, subd. (c)(7) and (8); 12022.5, subd. (a); and 12022.53, subd. (b).)[1] Three other counts were dismissed. All the crimes occurred in the same general vicinity in Corona.
The court sentenced defendant to a total prison term of 13 years, the middle term of three years on count 1 for robbery plus an additional 10 years for the personal firearm use. The court imposed a concurrent three-year sentence on count 2 and stayed the 10-year firearm sentence.
Defendant appeals, contending the trial court erred by allowing testimony from Danny Verdugo regarding defendants suspicious conduct at a Shell station located near the robbery sites. In a related claim, defendant charges prosecutorial error. Additionally, defendant challenges the courts ruling denying his mistrial motion. Finally, defendant also maintains the trial court should have stayed the three-year sentence on count 2 rather than imposing it concurrently with the sentence on count 1. Court reject all defendants contentions and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale